14 Comments

Nice work!

Expand full comment

6 comments and just 12 likes for this? Astonishing! Amazing work especially interested in Glasgow data.

Expand full comment

Thank you! Fortunately the archives of the Glasgow Chief Medical Officer of Health Annual Reports were an easy to navigate source of continuous historical mortality data, because I never did find online archives of all the Registrar General reports for the whole of Scotland, but at least this way we can still see the historical data for a principal city in Scotland.

Expand full comment

Thanks is your post available to download?

Expand full comment

Is there a specific substack setting that enables easier downloading of a post? If there is I can put that in place, otherwise it is whatever the default is. Not sure that helps, but my options are whatever settings substack offers.

Expand full comment

Will look into it and thanks for your work

Expand full comment

Is it possible to get a copy of the full report and data to incorporate into data analytics for clear understanding of all aspects of the current paradigm.

Why do I?

Expand full comment

The Glasgow data specifically? There’s no full report that I know of, only a series of annual reports, which sometimes contain a couple decades of data each. The original documents from which I pulled the data are the Glasgow Chief Medical Officer of Health Annual Reports, which can be found as online archives here.

https://wellcomecollection.org

The data is spread out over about 70 volumes.

And I have it all (for whooping cough, measles, ans scarlet fever in Glasgow) in a spreadsheet too, which I can send to you. If you would like me to, email me (jdc.henderson@protonmail.com), and I’ll send you the spreadsheet.

Most places the data is likewise spread out over multiple volumes. The two places (of those charted here) I know of that do in fact have full official reports, by their national statistics institutes, with all the data for a century or more in one place, are Italy and Spain. Here is the Italian report:

https://www.istat.it/comunicato-stampa/la-mortalita-dei-bambini-ieri-e-oggi-in-italia-anni-1887-2011/

And here is the Spanish Report:

Analysis of Health in Spain Across the 20th Century

Expand full comment

That's quite the picture you've painted.

Having just looked at all the graphs, I'm left with the clear impression that the vast majority of these vaccines were introduced as solutions to problems that no longer existed.

It's also clear that the vaccines that were introduced earlier — when the diseases were still somewhat significant — and appeared as though they may have caused disease reduction, would, if only they'd been introduced a bit later, have also been brought in when the problems no longer existed.

Which is to say, that the picture you've painted leads me to suppose that it's the engineers and not the vaccinators who've knocked down disease, i.e., clean water and sanitation, as opposed to vaccines.

Expand full comment

Yes, in most cases whenever a vaccine comes along they (vaccinationists) commit a post hoc fallacy and start crediting the vaccine as having played a major role in the mortality decline from that point on. The flimsiness of their reasoning becomes crystal clear when one sees the big picture of mortality for multiple illnesses over time in multiple countries and cities.

Changes in the quality of drinking water, food, and air (still polluted but possibly much less than during the factory smoke stacks everywhere days of the high industrialization period), seem like prime candidates for having played a major role in the mortality decline. Length of working days, sunlight exposure, and social and psychological all seem worth keeping in mind too. The only commonly considered factor that is relatively easy to rule out, and relegate to the little or no importance category, is vaccines.

Expand full comment

Thanks for elaborating.

What's terrifying to me, is how your graphs show how the vaccinationists have used the unconnected mortality declines (especially via truncated graphs) to make their case. Knowing what so many of us now realize about the duplicity of the bio-medical/pharma mafia complex it's easy to imagine how, if it had a time machine, it would go back and introduce the vaccines at points in time where the graphs would allow them to claim ALL of the mortality declines.

"The only commonly considered factor that is relatively easy to rule out, and relegate to the little or no importance category, is vaccines." — BINGO!

Expand full comment

This series was amazing! Thank you ☺️

Expand full comment

Thanks for compiling!

If a picture is worth a thousand words, we're looking at roughly 72, 000 wordsworth.

To get the full compound effect, I look forward to going through them all in detail in a single sitting.

Expand full comment

Yes, all correct as the disease was nearly gone when the vaccines were introduced. Now for the reason why! It was a business model by the Rockefeller's and other players that coordinated the scam in order to make untold amounts of money, but more importantly it was a continuation of the Malthusian-eugenics project. Decades of brainwashing the public into thinking that the only wat to protect yourself and your children was vaccination with putrid and vile substances, and it worked verry well as can be seen in the way medicine is practiced and the faith put in doctors, medical researchers, pharmaceutical cartels. Perdue pharma was actually the plan of all of them. They always sacrifice one occasionally to pretend that the bad apple has been removed from the barrel. The old Chek proverb states that the big thieves hang the little ones! I find this to be true, Jack. Ps. Rockefeller the senior, not the oil Barron but his father, was a snake oil salesman in a wagon traveling around selling poisons that killed people and had to change his name several times because he was wanted by the authorities and the con continued with greater damage than the old man could have imagined.

Expand full comment